Tel: +998712392813

2023
Научный электронный журнал «Экономика труда и человеческий капитал», Специальный выпуск

Достойный труд

THE GRAVITY TRADE MODEL FOR UZBEKISTAN

DOI 10.67668/LEHC/voliss/471 Google Scholar Поиск в Scholar Страницы 416-424

Опубликован 2023-10-19

Авторы
Nurbek Khalimjonov a , Piratdin Allayarov b
Организации
a Ташкентский государственный экономический университет image/svg+xml
b Ташкентский государственный экономический университет image/svg+xml
PDF (английский) Скачать

Аннотация

The generalized gravity model is used to analyze the trade between Uzbekistan and its main trading partners using the panel data estimate technique, and an attempt is made to establish a theoretical rationale for its use in the analysis of bilateral trade. The gravity model of commerce (the total of exports and imports), the gravity model of export, and the gravity model of import have all been estimated. Our findings indicate that the size of the economies, differences in per capita GNP, and openness of the trading nations all favorably influence trade with Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan’s exports are mostly determined by the exchange rate, overall import demand from partners, and Uzbekistan’s economic openness. Positive effects on Uzbekistan’s exports are caused by all three elements. Contrarily, the exchange rate has no bearing on Uzbekistan’s imports, which are instead influenced by the inflation rates, disparities in per capita income, and trade openness of the participating nations. It has been discovered that the cost of transportation significantly affects Uzbekistan’s trade negatively. The border between Uzbekistan and Kazakstan is also proven to have a significant impact on imports into Uzbekistan. The country-specific impacts demonstrate that Uzbekistan would prosper more if it increased trade with its neighbors. Factors associated with multilateral barriers favorably impact Uzbekistan’s exports and trade.

Ключевые слова

Gravity Model, Export model, Import model, Panel Data, Uzbekistan’s Trade

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Anderson, J.E. 1979. ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 69: 106-16
  2. Bikker, J.A. 1987. ‘An International Trade Flow with Substitution: An Extension of the Gravity Model’, KYKLOS, 40:315-37
  3. Deardorff, A.V. 1984. ‘Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows’, Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland
  4. Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. 1997. ‘Technology and Bilateral Trade’, in NBER Working Paper, No. 6253, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
  5. Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. 2000. ‘The Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation: A Three Way Model with Bilateral Interaction Effects’, Working Paper, Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Vienna, Austria
  6. Feenstra, R. 2003. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Chapter 5, Princeton University Press
  7. Fuller,W.A. and Battese G.E. 1974. Estimation of Linear Models with Cross Error Structure, Journal of Econometrics 2:67-78
  8. Greene, W.H. 1997. Econometric Analysis, New Jersey 07458 (Third edition)
  9. Helpman, E and Krugman, P. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  10. Helpman, E. 1984. ‘ Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets, Trade Theory’, in Ronald W. Jones and Peter B. Kenen, eds. Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, North- Holland
  11. Helpman, E. 1989 ‘Monopolistic Competition in Trade Theory’, Frank Graham Memorial Lecture, 1989 special paper 16, International Finance Section, Princeton University
  12. Helpman, E. and Krugman P.R. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Return, Imperfect Competition, and International Economy, Cambridge, USA
  13. Helpman, E. and Krugman, P.R. 1989. Trade Policy and Market Structure, Cambridge Mass: MIT Press
  14. Hummels, D. and Levinsohn, J. 1993. ‘Product Differentiation as a Source of Comparative Advantage’ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LXXXIII: 445-49
  15. International Financial Statistics (IFS) CD-ROM, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
  16. Jakab,Z.M. et. al 2001. ‘How Far Has Trade Integration Advanced?: An Analysis of the Actual and Potential Trade of Three Central and Eastern European Countries’, Journal of Comparative Economics 29: 276-292
  17. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  18. https://www.stat.uz
  19. https://www.worldometers.info/

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.