Tel: +998712392813

2023
Scientific electronic journal "Labor Economics and Human Capital", Special issue

Decent Work

FACTORS AFFECTING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTION IN UZBEKISTAN

DOI 10.67668/LEHC/voliss/457 Google Scholar Search in Scholar Pages 318-328

Published 2023-10-19

Authors
Abdurakhmanova Zuhra Tokhir qizi
Affiliation
Tashkent State University of Economics image/svg+xml
PDF Download

Abstract

In the article, we studied the factors influencing the food production index. Factors include agricultural land, per capita expenditure, import volume index, rural population, export volume index and cereal crop yield. These variables are denoted by y and x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6 respectively. In addition, the relationship between the residuals was checked using the Heteroscedasticity test and found to be normally distributed. Data for variables were obtained from World Bank report. The relationship between these variables was checked with multi-collinearity, and we also checked how reliable the data of the variables was using the STATA 17 program.

Keywords

OLS, regression, correlation, model parameters, model estimation, export volume index, import volume index, agriculture

References

  1. Van Loon M, Vonk W, (2023) Circularity indicators and their relation with nutrient use efficiency in agriculture and food systems. Agricultural Systems, journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy http;//dio.org/ 10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100122
  2. Ram Kumar Singha , Pawan Kumar Joshi, (2022). Indicator based assessment of food security in SAARC nations under the influence of climate change scenarios. Future Foods, journal homepage: www. elsevier.com/locate/fufo
  3. Ramoudane Orou Sannou a,b, , Sabrina Kirschke a,c , Edeltraud Günther(2023)) Integrating the social perspective into the sustainability assessment of agri-food systems: A review of indicators, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.05.014
  4. Donald, S.; Martin, K. On Open Innovation, Platforms, and Entrepreneurship. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2018, 12, 354–368. 32. Matteo, R.; Jamel, C.; Domenico, G.; Giuseppe, F. Corporate venture capitalists as entrepreneurial knowledge accelerators in global innovation ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 142, 512–523. 33
  5. Dattée, B.; Alexy, O.; Autio, E. Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High. Acad. Manag. J. 2018, 61, 466–498. [CrossRef]
  6. Mukhopadhyay, B.R.; Mukhopadhyay, B.K. ‘Come Together’ with Open Innovation, Research Gate, February 2022. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358769735_T1 textquoterightCome_TogetherT1textquoteright_with_ Open_Innovation (accessed on 20 February 2022)
  7. Carvalho, F.; Bonfim, L.; Cruz, A. The process of opening innovation networks: Open innovation at EmbrapaFlorestas. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2021. [CrossRef]
  8. Leminen, S.; Nyström, A.-G.; Westerlund, M. Change processes in open innovation networks— Exploring living labs. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 91, 701–718. [CrossRef]
  9. Bonfim, L.; Gonçalves, S.; Segatto, A.; Jacometti, M. The Idea Innovation Network model: The Case of the INDI-Saúde. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2020, 23, 250–266. [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.; Gao, S. Platform Economy and Internet Platform Monopoly. BCP Bus. Manag. 2021, 13, 160–163. [CrossRef]
  11. Aarikka-Stenroos, L.; Jaakkola, E.; Harrison, D.; Mäkitalo, T. How to manage innovation processes in extensive networks: A longitudinal study. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2017, 67, 88–105. [CrossRef]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.