Tel: +998712392813

2023
Научный электронный журнал «Экономика труда и человеческий капитал», Специальный выпуск

Гендерное равенство

GENDER INEQUALITY IN LABOUR MARKET

DOI 10.67668/LEHC/voliss/452 Google Scholar Поиск в Scholar Страницы 262-268

Опубликован 2023-10-19

Авторы
Abdurakhmanova Gulnora Kalandarovna a , Khalimjonov Nurbek Ulugbek ugli b
Организации
a Tashkent State Economic University Professor of the Department of “Human Resources Management”
b Ташкентский государственный экономический университет image/svg+xml
PDF (английский) Скачать

Аннотация

The labor market is used as the primary example in this study to examine the effects of the unequal division of domestic labor on men’s and women’s motivations for involvement and effort in competitive relationships. We discovered that prejudice in favor of women at moderate levels encourages men and women to work more and increase women’s engagement. It cannot, however, ensure that men and women put in an equal amount of effort and full participation without causing economic inefficiency or even distorting the labor market. Given these restrictions, we examine the outcomes of a different approach to policy that encourages males to participate in household duties. The major takeaway is that we must first address the household issue if we want men and women to have equal opportunities in the job market. Despite having a bigger proportion of the domestic workforce, women are less competitive than males. We anticipate that the information we have gathered will help decision-makers and scholars create legislation that will give men and women the same opportunities in the job market.

Ключевые слова

Gender equality, Affirmative action, Cost reduction policies, Efficiency, Women participation

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Adams J (1963) Towards an understanding of inequality. J Abnorm Norm Soc Psychol 67(5):422–436
  2. Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Competition and gender in the labor market. Handbook Labor Economics 3:3143–3259
  3. Benschop Y, Schreurs P, Halsema L (2001) The division of inequalities and labour between the sexes: anideological dilemma. Gender Work Organ 8(1):1–18
  4. Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Ind Labor Relat Rev 55(1):3–21
  5. Bianchi SM (2000) Maternal employment and time with children: dramatic change or surprising continuity?
  6. Blau FD, Kahn LM (2016) The gender wage gap: extent, trends, and explanations. Tech. rep., National
  7. Coate S, Loury GC (1993) Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? Am Econ Rev83(5):1220–1240
  8. Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit 47(2):448–474
  9. Cubel M, Sánchez-Pagés S (2017) Gender differences and stereotypes in strategic reasoning. Econ J 127(601):728–756
  10. Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: experimental evidence. Econ Inq 51(1):816–835
  11. Flory JA, Gneezy U, Leonard K, List J et al (2018) Gender, age, and competition: a disappearing gap? J Econ Behav Organ 150:256–276
  12. Frisco ML, Williams K (2003) Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. J Fam Issues 24(1):51–73
  13. U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Am Econ Rev 94(2):377–381
  14. Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: gender differences
  15. Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manag Rev10(1):76–88
  16. Greenstein TN (2000) Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: a replication and extension. J Marriage Fam 62(2):322–335
  17. Grossbard-Shechtman SA (1984) A theory of allocation of time in markets for labour and marriage. Econ J 94(376):863–82
  18. Holzer H, Neumark D (2000) Assessing affirmative action. J Econ Lit 38(3):483–568
  19. Lennon MC, Rosenfield S (1994) Relative fairness and the division of housework: the importance of options. A J Sociol 100(2):506–531 Lundberg SJ (1991) The enforcement of equal opportunity laws under imperfect information: affirmativeaction and alternatives. Q J Econ 106(1):309–326
  20. Lundberg S, Pollak RA (1996) Bargaining and distribution in marriage. J Econ Perspect 10(4):139–158
  21. Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Q Econ 122(3):1067–1101
  22. Olsen W, Heuvelman H, Gash V, Vandecasteele L, Walthery P (2010) The gender pay gap in the UK 1995–2007. Government Equalities Office
  23. Pascall G, Lewis J (2004) Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. J Soc Policy 33(3):373–394
  24. Schotter A, Weigelt K et al (1992) Asymmetric tournaments, equal opportunity laws, and affirmative action: some experimental results. Q J Econ 107(2):511–539
  25. Vandegrift D, Brown P (2005) Gender differences in the use of high-variance strategies in tournament competition. J Socio Econ 34(6):834–849
  26. Welch F (1976) Employment quotas for minorities. J Polit Econ 84(4):S105–S141

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)