IMPROVING THE SYSTEM OF HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN
Keywords:
human resource capacity, higher education, management system, professional development, Chinese experience, TSUE, Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service, Fergana State Technical University.Abstract
This article analyzes the issues of improving the system of human resource capacity management in higher education institutions (HEIs). The study focuses on three Uzbek institutions — Tashkent State University of Economics, Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service, and Fergana State Technical University. The current state of academic staff capacity is examined and compared with international practices, particularly China’s experience in higher education faculty development. Based on the findings, recommendations are provided for enhancing professional development, supporting young academics, and aligning HR capacity management in Uzbekistan with global standards.
References
1. Abdulla Avloniy National Institute of Teacher Training. Annual Report on Professional Development Programs. Tashkent, 2022.
2. Digital Education in Uzbekistan: Strategy and Progress. Ministry of Digital Technologies of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 2021.
3. European Commission. Erasmus+ Project Reports: HiEdTec and CANEM II. Brussels, 2019–2022.
4. Li, Y. & Chen, X. “Faculty Development in Chinese Universities: Policies and Practices.” International Journal of Higher Education Policy, 2018, 11(2): 45–63.
5. National Pedagogical University (Nizami TSPU). Faculty Development and Teacher Excellence Initiatives. Tashkent, 2022.
6. UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report: Teachers and Capacity Development. Paris, 2020.
7. World Bank. Modernizing Higher Education in Uzbekistan: Policy Note. Washington, DC, 2021.
8. Xu, H. “Mentorship and academic development in Chinese universities.” Journal of Comparative Education, 2019, 55(3): 289–307.
9. Zhao, J. “Performance-based promotion in Chinese higher education institutions: Benefits and risks.” Asian Education Review, 2020, 28(4): 377–392.
