Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

COMPATIBILITY OF GREEN FINANCING WITH DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Affiliations
a Tashkent State University of Economics image/svg+xml
b Tashkent State University of Economics image/svg+xml

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact of the integration and synergy of digital technologies and artificial intelligence with the green economy, green finance, and financing on sustainable development, beyond their applications in production, online and offline commerce, and data storage (Big Data, etc.) in the economic sector.

The limitations of economic resources and land area, the growing global population, and its uneven distribution, along with the emission of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in production processes, are contributing to climate change, biodiversity loss, depletion of natural resources, and economic losses.

Therefore, in the era of digital technologies, it is possible to ensure sustainable development through artificial intelligence and financial technologies (FinTech). This approach is theoretically substantiated and widely applied in practice. Artificial intelligence and FinTech innovations offer optimal solutions to green economic challenges, promoting the development of an environmentally sustainable economy, efficient resource utilization, and the reduction of carbon emissions.

Keywords

Array


References

  1. 1. K, Gofurova, “YASHIL INVESTITSIYALARNI RIVOJLANTIRISHDA DAVLAT BYUDJETINING O’RNI”// «Sanoat iqtisodiyoti va menejmenti: muammo va yechimlar» mavzusidagi IV-xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya materiallari. Maqolalar va tezislar to‘plami. –T.: «ZUXRO BARAKA BIZNES» , 2024. 617 b.
  2. 2. J. A. Schumpter, Captitalism, Socialllism and Democracy, New York: Harper: Harper & Brothers, NewYork, NY, USA, 1942.
  3. 3. R. Nanda and T. Nicholas, “Did bank distress stifle innovation during the great depression?” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 273–292, 2014.
  4. 4. Purnomo, A., Susanti, T., Rosyidah, E., Firdausi, N., and Idhom, M. (2022). Digital economy research: thirty-five years insights of retrospective review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 197, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.119
  5. 5. Akberdina, V. V. (2018). Digitalization of industrial markets: regional characteristics. Manag. 9 (6), 78–87. doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-6-8
  6. 6. Савина Т. Н. Цифровая экономика как новая парадигма развития: вызовы, возможности и перспективы// Финансы и кредит. 2018. Т. 24. No3. С. 579–590.
  7. 7. Котляров И.Д. Финтех: сущность и модели реализации// ЭКО. 2018. No12 (534). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/finteh-suschnost-i-modeli-realizatsii.
  8. 8. D’amato, D., and Korhonen, J. (2021). Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol. Econ. 188, 107143. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143
  9. 9. Bouchoucha, N. (2021). The effect of environmental degradation on health status: do institutions matter? J. Knowl. Econ. 12 (4), 1618–1634. doi:10.1007/s13132-020-00680-y
  10. 10. Ali, E. B., Anufriev, V. P., and Amfo, B. (2021). Green economy implementation in Ghana as a road map for a sustainable development drive: a review. Sci. Afr. 12, e00756. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00756
  11. 11. Adeshola, I., Usman, O., Agoyi, M., Awosusi, A. A., and Adebayo, T. S. (2023). “Digitalization and the environment: the role of information and communication technology and environmental taxes in European countries,” in Natural resources forum (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd).
  12. 12. Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W., and Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and communications technologies for sustainable development goals: state-of-the-art, needs and perspectives. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 20 (3), 2389–2406. doi:10. 1109/COMST.2018.281230.
  13. 13. Niebel, T. (2018). ICT and economic growth–Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Dev. 104, 197–211. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.024.
  14. 14. Wang, J., Wang, K., Dong, K., and Shahbaz, M. (2022b). How does the digital economy accelerate global energy justice? Mechanism discussion and empirical test. Energy Econ. 114, 106315. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106315.
  15. 15. Li, Y., Yang, X., Ran, Q., Wu, H., Irfan, M., and Ahmad, M. (2021). Energy structure, digital economy, and carbon emissions: evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 64606–64629. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15304-4.
  16. 16. Kuntsman, A., and Rattle, I. (2019). Towards a paradigmatic shift in sustainability studies: a systematic review of peer reviewed literature and future agenda setting to consider environmental (Un) sustainability of digital communication. Environ. Commun. 13 (5), 567–581. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1596144.
  17. 17. MacLean, D., Andjelkovich, M. and Vetter, T. (2007). Internet governance and sustainable development:Towards a common agenda. Retrieved September, 2010, from http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/igsd_common_agenda
  18. 18. Meyliyev O.R., & Gofurova K. (2024). Fiskal siyosatni rivojlantirishda "yashil" budjet daromadlarini oʻrganish. Yashil Iqtisodiyot Va Taraqqiyot, 2(4), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14211456
  19. 19. https://uz.council.science/news/call-experts-ipcc-climate-change-cities/
  20. 20. Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.